Shippensburg University

Search
Search
News
Multimedia
Sports
Ship Life
Opinion
Subscribe
Entertainment
Send a Tip
Podcasts
Donate

Shippensburg University

°
Full Forecast

Saturday, December 13, 2025

The Slate

Subscribe

Print Edition

  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Multimedia
  • Send a Tip
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Ship Life
  • Multimedia
  • Podcasts
  • Special Issues
  • Send a Tip
  • Donate
Search

Subscribe

 

10/4/2016, 12:18am

Presidential debate is complete disaster

By Missy Langdon
Presidential debate is complete disaster

The first presidential debate proved to Americans that this election year is definitely going to be one like no other.

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

Can anyone truly say they were surprised at the outcome of last Monday night’s presidential debate?

Again, all we got from a 90-minute time slot was back and forth drama between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. As voters, we continue to hope for some substance from the candidates, yet our hopes are never fulfilled.

To start, we had a moderator who seemed to be a bit one-sided in his questioning. There were no questions asked about Benghazi or the email scandal, which are huge and pressing issues. Yet, Trump was bombarded with questions about his past comments. Regardless of each candidates’ past, it is time for the true issues to be talked about.

While Clinton did her usual vague and almost sarcastic-sounding answers to everything that was asked, Trump was confident in his responses, even though he had about three of them on repeat throughout the entire debate.

For Clinton, from hiring psychologists and spending so much time preparing for this debate, I think I am not the only one who expected a lot more from her. Already being a hard person to trust due to her recent past, it seems as though she either has things to hide, or she truly just does not know what she is going to do if she wins the election.

Trump could have been more prepared. Although he seemed to study a few questions, he was not prepared for the whole exam. He seemed to talk in circles like he usually does. He was doing great in the beginning, then right when the audience started to think, “Maybe he is changing his tone a little bit,” he decided it was a good idea to bring up the fact that he decided not to speak about the affairs of Bill Clinton.

With the post-debate ratings showing that both of the candidates lied a near equal amount, as an individual who wants to make an informed vote in this election, it is hard to think that we have to choose one of these individuals to be the leader of this country.

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the writer and are not representative of The Slate or its staff as a whole


Share



Related Stories

Easy ways to develop a positive mindset

By Abbygale Hockenberry

Say It Loud: Ariana Tomb

Things you learn while growing up

By Missy Langdon


The Slate welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic. Read our full guidelines here.


Most Popular


11/18/2025, 4:14pm

‘Partners in Peace’ program revealed at Nov. 14 Council of Trustees meeting

By George Hogan

11/18/2025, 8:00am

Football head coach Mark Maciejewski retires after 32 years at SU


11/25/2025, 5:28pm

The Scopes Monkey Trial 100 years later


11/18/2025, 3:40pm

An hour with President Patterson to answer students’ questions



  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Work For Us
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2025 The Slate

Powered by Solutions by The State News.