Shippensburg University

Search
Search
News
Multimedia
Sports
Ship Life
Opinion
Subscribe
Entertainment
Send a Tip
Podcasts
Donate

Shippensburg University

°
Full Forecast

Monday, June 16, 2025

The Slate

Subscribe

Print Edition

  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Multimedia
  • Send a Tip
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Ship Life
  • Multimedia
  • Podcasts
  • Special Issues
  • Send a Tip
  • Donate
Search

Subscribe

 

9/10/2024, 4:07pm

Dragon Drama: George R. R. Martin’s issues with “House of the Dragon”

By Ian Thompson

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

Season two of HBO’s “House of the Dragon” wrapped up Aug. 4this Wednesday with a season finale that promised fire and blood in season three. Since then, George R. R. Martin, the author of the series’ source material, has raised some serious concerns with the direction of the show. 

“House of the Dragon” is an adaptation of Martin’s 2018 book “Fire & Blood,” a companion text to his “A Song of Ice and Fire” series which was adapted to screen as “Game of Thrones.” The show is a prequel to the main series, telling the story of the civil war that ravaged House Targaryen nearly two centuries before Daenerys Targaryen. 

On the heels of “Game of Thrones’” disastrous final seasons, fans of Martin’s world were delighted with the first season of “House of the Dragon.” While it had some issues, it was a return to form that reminded many of the early seasons of “Game of Thrones.” 

Season two, however, disappointed many with storylines that kept characters in holding patterns, retread the same dialogues and conflicts, or were just poor writing. It seems it was too much for Martin to stay silent. 

Martin thus far has remained fairly quiet on the television adaptations of his work. He offered some praise for earlier seasons of both shows, which he was involved with. After the airing of season one of “House of the Dragon,” Martin told showrunners that their version of King Viserys was better than the one he had written. 

After season two episode one, Martin joked about how the show had omitted a character from a scene, jokingly calling him “Maelor the Missing.” Maelor, who in the book is the second son of Aegon and Helaena, has been written out of the show. 

After teasing that he had additional thoughts late in August, Martin posted a blog post on Sept. 4 digging deeper into this omission, and how it lessens the impact of certain events in the story and hamstrings the show’s future. The post is titled “Beware the Butterflies” and Martin argues that Maelor’s absence makes certain storylines fall apart and removes other characters’ motivations. 

The blog post was deleted shortly after being posted, possibly due to spoilers for season three. For those not afraid of spoilers, it has been archived here. 

Share



Related Stories

TLOU Season Two: The Lodge Scene

By Jeremiah Clawson

TLOU Season Two: The Lodge Scene

By Jeremiah Clawson

‘InZOI’ vs. ‘The Sims 4’

By Mara Robinson


The Slate welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic. Read our full guidelines here.


Most Popular


6/5/2025, 7:19pm

Shippensburg University student faces charges following assault in SU dorm

By Evan Dillow

5/21/2025, 12:13pm

SU softball going to Division II Women’s College World Series after sweep of Kutztown


6/3/2025, 8:26am

The 2025 PSAC Championships leave the SU Women’s Track & Field team in fifth place



  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Work For Us
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2025 The Slate

Powered by Solutions by The State News.