Shippensburg University

Search
Search
News
Multimedia
Sports
Ship Life
Opinion
Subscribe
Entertainment
Send a Tip
Podcasts
Donate

Shippensburg University

°
Full Forecast

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

The Slate

Subscribe

Print Edition

  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Multimedia
  • Send a Tip
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Ship Life
  • Multimedia
  • Podcasts
  • Special Issues
  • Send a Tip
  • Donate
Search

Subscribe

 

3/17/2020, 11:34am

Commentary: Political propaganda about Hillary Clinton should not distract from issue of coronavirus

By Adam Friscia

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

A recent analysis of social media metrics reveals that Hillary Clinton’s emails were more topical on Super Tuesday than the general election or coronavirus, according to Vox contributor Aaron Rupar.

“According to data compiled by CrowdTangle, the most total interactions on Facebook came on a Fox News article about a federal judge granting a request from a right-wing group named Judicial Watch to make Clinton sit for a sworn deposition about her use of a private email server when she was secretary of state," Vox said.

Let’s put that in perspective. Not only was it a presidential primary day, but the coronavirus was spreading throughout the country. Investor confidence on Wall Street was waning and the Federal Reserve System had just announced historic interest rate cuts. 

Given the circumstances, how is it possible that Clinton’s four-year-old email scandal was the most pressing social media story of the day? 

“I begrudgingly give them a lot of credit because they are shaping a narrative. They know how to deliver those stories through the algorithms into the feeds of millions and millions of people," Clinton said in an interview published by Politico. 

Historically, Clinton is a preferred talking point for conservative commentators as she elicits outrage from the Republican base. This explains why the right wing continuously invokes her name during times of crisis.  

Predictably, current efforts to deflect criticism from United States President Donald Trump’s handling of the coronavirus have involved Clinton.

On a recent broadcast, Fox News host Laura Ingraham suggested Trump's reaction to the pandemic was far better than Clinton's could have been if she won the presidency. 

“If her handling of Benghazi is any guide, it would have been a nightmare,” Ingraham said. 

Regardless of your political affiliation, everyone must ask themselves the following question: What possible relevance do Clinton’s emails or her association with Benghazi have with current events? If you answer objectively, the answer is none.

Instead of engaging in false propaganda, focus on reality. We are dealing with an infectious outbreak during a general election year. Fixating on Clinton will not contain the coronavirus or augment one’s voting preference. So be mindful of your news feed. And if you are a Democratic strategist, consider improving your social media skills. 

Share



Related Stories

School Work Stock.jpg

The Slate Speaks: Surviving Finals

By Slate Staff

We are not meant to be alone

By Abbygale Hockenberry

The AI Bubble Speculation

By Gavin Formenti


The Slate welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic. Read our full guidelines here.


Most Popular


11/18/2025, 4:14pm

‘Partners in Peace’ program revealed at Nov. 14 Council of Trustees meeting

By George Hogan

11/18/2025, 8:00am

Football head coach Mark Maciejewski retires after 32 years at SU


11/18/2025, 3:40pm

An hour with President Patterson to answer students’ questions


11/25/2025, 5:28pm

The Scopes Monkey Trial 100 years later



  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Work For Us
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2025 The Slate

Powered by Solutions by The State News.