Shippensburg University

Search
Search
News
Multimedia
Sports
Ship Life
Opinion
Subscribe
Entertainment
Send a Tip
Podcasts
Donate

Shippensburg University

°
Full Forecast

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

The Slate

Subscribe

Print Edition

  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Multimedia
  • Send a Tip
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • Ship Life
  • Multimedia
  • Podcasts
  • Special Issues
  • Send a Tip
  • Donate
Search

Subscribe

 

12/3/2014, 7:45pm

Why the two party system is failing

By Amanda Mehall

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

What political party do you consider yourself a member of, democrat or republican? It seems like those are the only two options.

Most Americans, however, consider themselves to be somewhere in between the two or sometimes another party. Since the majority of Americans do not see themselves 100 percent republican or democrat, they just choose the side they feel they agree more with.

One typically registers under the Democratic or Republican Party and votes, accordingly, even if they do not necessarily feel they agree with a lot of things the candidate of their party believes.

Even though candidates in the presidential election are allowed to belong to any party, ultimately it boils down to a two-party system. Third-party candidates get significantly less press coverage, funding and have less of a support base, meaning people are less willing to volunteer for a third party.

Also, another huge factor is that republicans and democrats view third parties as a threat, known as a “splinter group.” The fear of splinter groups, or groups that break off from one of the two major political parties, create the idea that if one splinter group becomes successful, many more will follow. These splinter groups would then essentially decrease the overall power of the democrats and republicans. A third party will grow from either the democratic or republican party, sharing a similar foundation. Thus, the party they stemmed from would become less organized and unified.

The lack of third-party candidates destroys diversity in the political spectrum. The two-party system in America, currently, does not create an accurate representation of the American people. I believe many voters feel as if having a third-party president would be “un-American,” but this mentality is far from accurate. In fact, the Founding Fathers believed that political parties would only hurt a representative government and believed they had no place in a democracy.

Today, the American people depend heavily on the two parties, alone, and have polar opposite views, so the idea of a compromise seems unattainable. Political disputes will continue into the future until we create some official tiebreaker for hyper-partisanship and I believe third parties could potentially be that solution.

Share



Related Stories

The ship letters outside of Old Main spring 2025

The Slate Speaks: Time to Right the Ship

By Slate Staff

‘Be Curious, Not Judgmental’

By Matthew Scalia

Remember Britain this summer

By Sophia Bartash


The Slate welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic. Read our full guidelines here.


Most Popular


5/15/2025, 11:55am

DOGE spending cuts target AmeriCorps, impacting student volunteers and communities across the U.S.

By Evan Dillow

5/9/2025, 5:46pm

Bernie Sanders takes ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ tour to Harrisburg


5/6/2025, 11:07pm

Shapiro pledges support for first responders during visit to Michaux State Forest


5/21/2025, 12:13pm

SU softball going to Division II Women’s College World Series after sweep of Kutztown



  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Work For Us
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Ship Life
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2025 The Slate

Powered by Solutions by The State News.